The Ryzen 5 5600G is basically the Ryzen 5 5500, so it has the same six Zen 3 cores, the same 12 threads, and the same 16 MB 元 cache, but it also has slightly higher clock speeds and working integrated graphics.
#Amd ryzen Pc
Who it's for: Gamers who can't afford a discrete GPU at the moment and hobbyists who want to build a compact PC without discrete graphics. Why you should buy this: The Ryzen 5 5600G is the cheapest Zen 3 desktop APU, providing both good CPU performance and decent integrated graphics. When you can buy the 5500 for just $5 more, the 4500 basically has no reason to exist. Like the 5500, the 4500 is basically an APU with the graphics disabled, but it uses the much older Zen 2 architecture that came out in 2019, not to mention it has a measly 8MB of 元 cache. If you're looking for the best bang for your buck, it's just not worth it to pay $45 more for the 5600 or $60 more for the 5600X.Īlongside the Ryzen 5 5500, AMD also launched the Ryfor $135, but we really don't think anyone should buy this CPU. The 5500 can easily do 120-plus frames per second in games]() and has similar multi-threaded performance to the 56X. In spite of this lack of cache, the 5500 performs well enough to be worth it. This means the 5500 only has 16 MB of 元 cache as opposed to the 32 MB of the 5600X and 5600. The 5500 is based on the same silicon that Ryzen APUs use, but with the integrated graphics disabled. On the surface, this is identical to the more expensive 5600X, as well as the Ry(which currently retails for around $185), but the 5500 is actually quite different from its neighbors.
So, what do you get for $140? Six cores and 12 threads utilizing the Zen 3 architecture. The price of the 5600X had fallen in the meantime, but at the time of writing, it is still about $200, whereas the 5500 can be found for around $140. The Ryzen 5 5600X, with an MSRP of $300, was the cheapest CPU you could buy until the much cheaper Rycame out in April 2022.
When AMD launched Ryzen 5000 in late 2020, we had no idea we wouldn't see a truly budget Ryzen 5000 CPU for over a year. Who it's for: Gamers and hobbyists who want the best bang for their buck. An expansion is only fair.Why you should buy this: The Ryis the cheapest Zen 3 desktop CPU and has good mid-range performance. This is an area where AMD has trailed Intel for several generations now. The memory subsystem will also get a facelift, increasing the load-store and L2 bandwidth. It’s unclear whether AMD will widen or add another execution port, but if so, the Floating Point EUs will get the upgrade. The retire/reorder buffer should also get larger, leading to a powerful backend. The front end will be revamped with a wider issue and higher decoder count.
#Amd ryzen upgrade
The Zen 5 core will be a major upgrade over Zen 4. AMD plans to launch its Zen 5 offerings in 2024, probably in Q2 or Q3, for the client Ryzen parts. The final retail versions will be faster or at least more efficient than these early chips. With all said and done, it’s important to note that these are engineering samples. As for the single-threaded performance, we’re looking at 2,500 to 2,700 points, a healthy 10% uplift over the Core i9-13900K. The hex-core Ryzen 5 8600X is allegedly capable of 17,000 points, roughly 14% higher than the 7600X. Meanwhile, the octa-core Ryzen 7 8700X nets 23,000 points, roughly the same as the Core i5-13600K. The 12-core Ryzen 9 8900X allegedly scores 36,000 points, placing it right behind the 7950X. Featuring the Zen 5 core architecture on TSMC’s 4nm (enhanced 5nm), these chips are expected to offer a substantial performance uplift over existing Ryzen 7000 parts.Īccording to RedGamingTech, the 16-core Ryzen 9 8950X scores 49,000 points in Cinebench R23 nT, making it nearly 30% faster than its predecessor while beating the Intel Core i9-13900K by at least ~20%. AMD’s response to the rebranded lineup will be slightly delayed as the Ryzen 8000 processors are slated to land next year. Intel plans to release its 14th Gen Raptor Lake-SR next month, offering double-digit performance improvements with a simple refresh.
0 kommentar(er)
